As I mentioned before, I missed last month's open mic at the Springfield Funny Bone, but I see no reason to miss it next Wednesday. The question now is which 6 of the 45-60 minutes I've written in the past two months I should use. I don't live in a metro area, so it's not like I get to try out two or three bits a week. The answer is, of course, whichever bit is funniest, but as all you creative writer types out there know, everything you do is equally fantastic until someone you respect and admire tells you otherwise. I think I'll go with my routine on pubes. Everyone loves pubes, don't they?
In other news, I am continually amazed at the amount of typing
Ron Silliman does before breakfast, not to mention the kinds of things he is lucid enough to think about at that hour. He is one of those rare individuals who seems to be able to type as he thinks and make sense all at the same time. I am not one of these people, and I think this is a large part of the reason why my writing has gravitated towards comedy so much - once the gag is on the page, I lose any interest in dressing it up more than is necessary. For a long while I tried funneling my humor into essays, a la David Sedaris, but what I ended up with after days, weeks, or even months of effort was some funny bits stitched together by outstandingly shitty prose. I think this is why I started writing poetry in the first place - poems are brief (and I was a wit). Anyway, Ron, or one of his more attentive readers, or both, was going on about Charles Olson's idea of notions giving rise to notions, perceptions giving rise to perceptions, as a technique for writing, as if to ask whether it is a viable method.
Robin Williams.