Last night's post was brief due to fatigue.
My great expectations for my first visit to the Jukebox were partly realized in that I got to get onstage there, meet a couple of good folks, and put myself on the list for the upcoming competition. In other respects - getting a large, enthusiastic crowd and seeing some killer comics - things didn't pan out. Two or three of the open-mic performers top the list of the most atrocious I have ever seen. This means nothing, of course, because any one of them could get their shit together and wind up making it some day. I won't name names (because I don't remember them), but at least two guys told jokebook jokes.
Really.
"Three kids go to a whore house - a white one, a black one..." you get the idea. One guy had a red-stained maxi-pad as a prop. I assume it was food coloring because this guy's set wasn't getting him near any vaginas. At one point he smacked his own ass and said "I'm a pad pad boy." I'd rather have my eyelids pried open in the front row of a Gallagher performance, my fellow droogs, than see one more minute of that.
But the most interesting set was
Travis Lipski's. You might recall that I tied for first with Travis last month in Springfield at the Funny Bone monthly open-mic. At that show Travis turned out a damn good 6 minutes. He's got the angry-comic persona - raw, rude, etc. - and it works. He opened for
Doug Stanhope at least once. The guy's gotten paid. Last night, however, Travis was clearly a little more inebriated. He pulled out two 8.5 x 11 sheets of paper and tried, unsuccessfully, to read whatever jokes he had scrawled on them. There were several moments of silence. There was slow blinking. It was weird. The one admirable thing is that, clearly, Travis Lipski doesn't give a shit, and if you want to be a comic, that's one quality you need.
Despite my fatigue, I couldn't sleep last night and ended up writing/editing a couple bits for an hour or more. I looked at the tape from last night and thought hard about exactly what it is I want to do as a comic. Most of what I've done onstage so far has gotten a good response at least once, but the material is inconsistent. Some of it is cast as short personal narrative even if the stories are not factually true. For example, one bit describes a girlfriend's trimmed pubic hair and segues into a criticism of "porn-fashion" and male vanity (body-hair shaving, etc.). The writing itself is good (toot toot), but while the male vanity bit is me, the little narrative is not - it's wholly fabricated and seems too rehearsed onstage. Because it is. I try to make everything I write multi-layered; even if it's rude or raw, there's a social or political comment underneath it. It's the "underneath" part that's off - my best writing is where that comment is closer to the surface, the impetus of the bit. You can't win an audience by preaching on issues (even George Carlin has once or twice fallen into that angry social critic pit once or twice and gotten fewer laughs), but you can't fake it either, burying the meat of an idea behind a facade.
The most interesting thing I've learned from doing this comedy thing is that you have to
learn how to be yourself. Writing funny bits is fairly easy, getting to the heart of what you care about - and making that funny - is tough.